Artificial intelligence chatbot use has recently been in the headlines. Universities are finding it difficult to distinguish between essays authored by a living, breathing student and writings created by AI chatbots as they become more sophisticated.
Particularly, one chatbot has swept the internet. After becoming live on November 30, 2022, ChatGPT quickly surpassed 1 million subscribers. ChatGPT can complete a range of activities quickly and gives the impression that it is more human. Concerns concerning plagiarism in educational settings have also been addressed. Teachers are concerned that the usage of AI chatbots, like ChatGPT, could encourage plagiarism in homework and exam coursework. Concern is also increasing over academics’ usage of chatbots.
When we think of AI chatbots, ideas of futuristic bots like J.A.R.V.I.S from the film Ironman come to mind. J.A.R.V.I.S. (Just a Rather Very Intelligent System) was a self-aware robot that Tony Stark created and communicated with. Fantasy, you say?
possibly not Technology experts claim that advancements in AI have been phenomenal. It’s not like the past, when chatbots replaced real people in the customer care industry. Who doesn’t have a memory of shouting “representative” into the phone only to get the response, “I’m sorry, I didn’t understand you. Say representative.” Though not yet flawless, technology is improving. As AI becomes more proficient, professionals who write for a career, like journalists, tech writers, and novelists, may soon lose their jobs. A Japanese business is presently producing novels using AI, and it came close to winning a literary award.
But all hope is not lost. Edward Tian, a 22-year-old Princeton University senior, has created an app to determine whether text was authored using ChatGPT.
Tian is a computer science major with a journalism minor. Who better to investigate a strategy to counter the rise of AI plagiarism. His programme compares the writing styles of humans and machines. While human writing varies in length and complexity, bot writing is more consistently structured than human writing, which is known as “burstiness.” In the first week after its release, over 30,000 users utilised Tian’s software, which was so popular that it crashed the website. The free hosting service intervened to provide Tian with additional memory and resources to deal with the website traffic.
While not all papers generated by AI were caught, the majority of them were, giving teachers throughout the world hope that a new tool is available to assist in catching AI-made coursework.
“The title “journalist” is a very encompassing one. It can refer to someone who writes about the past in order to inform others or to someone who reports on current occurrences. There are numerous varieties of journalists, but one that is gaining popularity is one that uses artificial intelligence (AI). Although artificial intelligence has been around for a while, it has recently evolved significantly. AI is now able to learn how to do tasks without being given explicit instructions thanks to deep learning techniques. Thegood- ai.com, a website, wrote the previous sentence. It will assist with tale writing or narrative outlines for $5 each month. There is also a free version, however it only allows for 100 words per user. I entered “journalism against AI,” chose 700 words, and paid $5 to get what at first glance appeared to be a good piece. The essay lost all meaning about halfway through.
“The idea behind JennyBot was so that reporters could spend less time writing stories and more time doing other things like going out drinking with friends or watching Netflix shows instead of sitting at their desks writing articles all day long because there wasn’t much newsworthy information left for her since there was no longer anyone alive in Britain except for some stray cats living under bridges. Try telling your English professor about it. This website is not the lauded ChatGPT, which is not currently taking on any new users. AI helps to simplify a variety of activities and is here to stay. 92% of educational institutions are currently frequently utilising AI technology, according to an IDC survey. Schools are utilising AI technology to assist tailor the educational experiences of their students. Not all students acquire knowledge at the same rate as others. The same content can be modified by AI to suit each student’s learning style.
AI has advantages:
- Well-organized data. Students can benefit from tools like Quizlet by receiving the pertinent study materials; this eliminates the need for unnecessary internet research.
- A tailored educational experience. AI can create a learning plan for each individual student after determining their strengths and limitations.
- Better resources are available for students with special needs.
- Immersive education The conventional approach placed more emphasis on students’ ability to retain information than on their comprehension of it.
- Computerized tutoring programmes. Although ITS is not a novel idea, AI makes it simpler for teachers and tutors to properly examine student data.
There are not many drawbacks:
- The major drawback is the cost. Digitizing our schools costs a lot of money. The hardest hit would be the less wealthy school districts.
- As we use technology to teach our pupils more, social interaction between teachers and students may deteriorate.
- There could be an increase in unemployment. There is a chance that AI will eventually replace teaching personnel and tutors as it is employed more and more.
- Unauthorized access to personal data. As of now, human interaction and technology function best together. The settings are entered by humans, while AI handles the rest. People who make a living by writing can take it easy for the time being because the final product still needs to be refined by a real human.
Does it ease our concerns as parents that our children don’t have to put in as much effort to create college-worthy papers, or should we be concerned that schoolchildren don’t have to put in as much effort anymore? History is replete with tales of cataclysmic results when man defers to the reasoning of others.
